[00:00:00] Out of Cycle.

[00:00:29] What a fiasco, just an absolute cluster fiasco, nonsense, nightmare, garbage, outlaw, mudshow, rookie, rudimentary, every word you can think of is in play. CryptoTalk.fm, my name is Leicester, I'm your host. A weekend out of cycle. I committed doing it because there's a lot going on that people don't seem to understand and there are actually people that still don't believe despite the fact that there are sites out there where you can verify what I'm saying to be the truth. There are some that are in denial.

[00:00:59] I heard elsewhere somebody said that allegedly in Telescam there are still people hopeful because of and things he's saying and doing. I'm not here to talk about that specifically. I'm not here to talk about the new pre-sale ending quote. I'm not here to talk about the money side of things. There will be a brief mention because it's relevant to the topical matter but it is not the focus of the update. The focus of the update is to help people understand what's actually going on with the

[00:01:26] technology because unfortunately you're being lied to ironically from the side you would not have expected it from. Obviously, we're dealing with liars on all fronts but I'm saying that in this case, the one that's truly lying in the worst case is the one that some people are duped by. I did see one of the marks actually in one of these videos. It's floating on YouTube. So, I'm not going to talk about the mark but it's ironic.

[00:01:53] That means that the consensus or at least the remnants of have all kind of congregated together around Jeremy, formerly of Blockdag because Jeremy has sold them a bill of goods. When I say sell them a bill of goods, I don't suspect that he didn't sell them up. You know, he didn't sell them blank. I'm saying that what he sold them is not what you have and the fact that he could not do what he says that he is going to be doing in the short term tells me that we got larger

[00:02:21] issues with the underlying technology which affects on the other side. That's why I thought it was good to kind of talk it out so you can kind of understand it. We got to go back in time though. You need a history lesson. I'll be brief as I can but it's important you understand the history. When this whole thing first launched, the pitch was that it was going to be like Bitcoin. To be like Bitcoin, the idea was the technology need to be a essentially a UTXO based model. I'm not going to bore you with UTXO.

[00:02:50] I actually have a separate upload at CryptoTalk.fm that you can go and search for but suffice to say, the goal was to change how payments are done and consider Blockdag's speed with combined with rather the payment processing thought process of Bitcoin. Where did this vision come from? I have no idea. I suspect it was useless but I don't know for sure. Okay. At some point later, I want to say late 2024, 2025, somewhere in there,

[00:03:19] they decided to go away from it. That FAQ is actually still in the docs.block.network.io where they decided they're going to go away from UTXO and simply adopt EVM. This is a layer over top of what allegedly is a DAG. This is the messaging. I'm sharing the messaging that was told. At some point near when Turner was allied with consensus, at some point, they were talking about the challenges getting miners.

[00:03:46] And remember, they had done the walkthrough in that office with the miners and said, we're testing and we're testing and we're testing and we're testing and we're testing. And we saw some physical equipment and I forget the guy's name, but there was a guy on YouTube and he said, there's no miners. There's no miners. There are miners. That's important. And I want you to keep that in mind. What I just said, there are miners. Here's the reason I think that that statement, although factually accurate is moot. While there are miners, the stated numbers that they gave you

[00:04:16] at the time of the quoted price at launch would have yielded a couple of hundred dollars a day. Okay. Unfortunately, because the price crapped at this point, even if you had miners in the full wild, it wouldn't matter because it would cost you significantly more than it would be worth to run the shit. You'd make like nine bucks a year or something. So there's no real value in that mining. My theory, and it's only a theory, is that somebody had the idea.

[00:04:46] This is not going to work out doing it this way with these ASIC miners after they had collected the money for the shit. So they focused hot and heavy on the X1 miner. They focused hot and heavy on the tap miner. They focused hot and heavy on anything else that would basically facilitate traffic and then tried to create some sort of Frankensteiner technology that emulated what you would get at scale.

[00:05:12] That, okay, we've got millions and millions of people tap in and doing the X1s and all these that would create the same, but was software do it under the hood. That's theory. I don't know for sure, but ask yourself the question, why there was so much focus on the X1 miner when Turner was still in charge? I'll come back to that at some different episode. Now, the block DAG, I'm going to refer to two different ways.

[00:05:38] I'm going to say BDAG scan and I'm going to say .engineering. Why? Here's the aha for you. There are, there are two different ledgers. There's one chain. The ledger is an accounting term.

[00:06:03] You have transactions that took place, ins, outs, transfers, sends, sells, etc. Your transactions, okay? In order for a blockchain to have integrity of the transactions, there must be a ledger. The ledger is, its job is to maintain the integrity of the transaction over time for a given X.

[00:06:26] X could mean as your wallet transacts with the chain in and out, could be as the chain interacts with smart contracts, could be as D-apps interact with smart contracts, etc. and so on. The point is that all of this communication has to be accounted for, duly noted, properly tracked, properly traced. So when I tell you that there are two ledgers but one blockchain, you're wondering how that's possible.

[00:06:54] The blockchain itself is not what is maintaining the integrity specifically of the ledger. It's trusting nodes to, and this is where consensus, the true consensus, not the fake one, true consensus comes into play. Some months ago, I talked about the fact that the different RPCs, this is back when CEO was still in and you had RPC.blockdag.engineering, RPC.blockdag.works, RPC.bdackscan.com,

[00:07:22] and they were not in concert, they didn't agree, and I said that means you don't have consensus. And I had a mark come and attack me, here you are, fast forward, and you don't have consensus, even within the singular RPCs that I'll talk about in a second. The lack of consensus is the very evidence that you need to understand that there are different ledgers. Consensus simply means that whatever transactions and whatever history and whatever threading, that all of these different nodes all agree.

[00:07:52] The node is maintaining and tracking and reporting, to a more important degree, I'll get back to it, all of the transactions, blocks, everything that's happened up to, and it has to track whether it's up-to-date and current with what everybody else is saying. Big, if you will, a picture, quote the song, where you have one node, and that one node maintains a number of blocks,

[00:08:21] and it says this is the authority, but it's the only one. If you only have one authority, singular authority, you do not have any consensus, because you're trusting that singular authority, which contradicts a proof-of-work strategy, because if you have a proof-of-work strategy, the miners connect, and they do on behalf of that one node. But if it turns out that transactions were deleted, reorganized, or something happened, nobody would be the wiser, right?

[00:08:51] Because you're trusting the singular authority telling you that that's what it should be. Now, is that right or wrong? It's not even an ethical conversation. It simply is. So I want you to just accept it as is. If you have one authority who has their ledger, and they say there's 15 million blocks, period, everything connecting to it, your wallets, your miners, your DApps, everything must trust what that says as the factual truth. Now, what's the risk of that?

[00:09:19] The risk of that is what's referred to as poisoning. If you poison, that means transactions are happening, but what you expected to happen as a result of the transaction is either not true or didn't happen or got removed. That's a poisoning, and it's essentially an attack, but it could be from inside, because you only have one authority, and that one RPC could get breached. It goes back to my update about the SHIB ecosystem.

[00:09:45] With Shibarium, they actually had nodes get breached, wide scale, but it didn't matter that there was multiple of them. I think it was like 12 for one of these DApps. It didn't really matter because all of them essentially got compromised, and so it compromised the integrity of the data that all of them agreed to. So if you have consensus and it gets poisoned, it's just as bad as if you have singular and you get poisoned. What I'm getting at is the poisoning attack isn't the problem.

[00:10:14] The consensus isn't the problem. The understanding of what's happening is the true knowledge I am trying to share to you, listener, because if you understand what I just described to you, it means it doesn't matter if there's one node or 5,000 nodes. The only thing that matters is the transactions themselves and the results from those transactions being what you expect them to be. Okay? Now that I've level set the playing field, that's why there's two ledgers.

[00:10:42] BDAG Scan is the ledger that always has been. It's the ledger that they launched with, let's say January. I'm going to put a pin on it. January, quote, launched. When I say launched, I mean that they made it accessible for you to communicate with rpc.bdaxscan.com. Everything that had happened since started with rpc.bdaxscan.com, because that's all that was available.

[00:11:10] We get into the exchange launches. Everybody remembers what happens with the exchange launches. The exchange, all of them, they launched. There wasn't very many, but they launched, and the vast majority of them locked down deposits. Most of them locked down withdrawals. You could buy inside there if you want to. You could trade inside there if you want to, but you could not deposit the ones you had, and you could not withdraw if you did have some or you purchased some. You could not.

[00:11:39] Many speculated that this was the team telling the exchanges to lock it down. In some cases, that's true. In some cases, the exchange went, quote, went into business for themselves like WeBot, opened up deposits and withdrawals, but they did it in a roundabout way. WeBot allowed you to deposit to your ERC-20 address, and then they manually reconciled it at first, and then later they opened it wide scale. I had done multiple tests, and I told people, WeBot's legit. I'm telling you it's legit.

[00:12:08] People didn't believe me. I had marks all over me. I'm telling you it's legit. I'm telling you my history's out there. I'm telling you it's legit. I had done trades. I had stacked a pretty significant bag, quote, of BDAG because WeBot was legit, and I saw it was running like crazy. I snapshot the prices. It was crazy. It was like two zeros and four. It was nuts. People didn't believe me. They just did not believe me. That's fine. I'll do mine and whatever, and I tested sends in, out.

[00:12:37] I set up multiple wallets and spread. I tested the staking, which was still at this point, rpc.bdagscan.com, so I'm still on that. CEO now because Turner's out, CEO. He's starting to do DAG tech, which was rpc.dagtech.network, rpc.blockdag.engineering, rpc.blockdag.works, staking.blockdag.engineering. Remember that one? And I did an update where I said, avoid the staking.bdagscan.com,

[00:13:05] use the staking.blockdag.engineering. I had tested on staking.blockdag.engineering and didn't see any issues. There was also what's called Jarvis, which came from DAG tech, which came from DAWI, who was on the show. Turns out that DAG tech is the one who's essentially building the chain and the ledger and maintaining everything that's going on. So DAWI is under the hood here.

[00:13:32] Different organization, but DAWI is the, think of it as the technology lead. Think of it as the one who made the thing create. It wasn't Jeremy. Jeremy didn't build it. He's maintaining it. He didn't build it. DAWI and DAG tech are supporting it under the hood. DAWI and DAG tech are also the ones who are supporting the nodes on both ledger sides. Now, recently, and the reason I say that even in the past is because blockdag.engineering

[00:14:00] was spawned specifically at the request, allegedly from Jeremy. What I'm thinking happened is that Nick and Jeremy were in collusion on the side under the auspice, look it up, that they were doing it in support of the project as these cool type things, despite the fact that it was not lockstep with what wanted them to focus on. That's a theory.

[00:14:27] I don't know for sure, because when I tested blockdag.works, I tested blockdag.engineering. I was able to stake, unstake, claim rewards, et cetera. Nothing was different. Even within rpc.bdagscan.com, everything was working in concert. I didn't have any issues whatsoever with any of this in the mix. I then did an update, and you can go back in the history, where I gave where there was a rumor of a coup that had happened led by Jeremy. Turns out that there was somewhat of a coup.

[00:14:57] However, the timing is a little bit iffy. In February, so right around the same time as the exchange chaos that was going on, DAG tech, presumably at the request of Jeremy, though I can't prove it, but presumably this is what I'm reading into from DAG tech, at the request of Jeremy, branched off of the main blockdag.

[00:15:22] So when they branch it, the blockchain is still singular, but there are two different ledgers going on. So on one side, you've got what I refer to as community, and on the other side, you've got the BDAG scan. The BDAG scan side is the original, definitive, authoritative that had been. In February, then, when this branch happened, and if you're questioning what I'm telling you, I'll give you a URL in a second.

[00:15:51] But in February, when this happened, it would have been a snapshot in time of what was true as of the date that they took that branch. What that meant, though, because they took so damn long, and they didn't communicate in advance, and it was essentially like a hostile type deal. It wasn't like they were working with on this business. Because of all that, every transaction that you would have done from when they snapshot

[00:16:17] to when they fully committed to launching this business, which is now the new dot block or dot engineering side. All those transactions are, they don't exist on the community side. More importantly, anything that would have happened from pre-sale activities does not essentially exist on the community side because they did not replicate, far as I can tell, any of that transactional activities.

[00:16:48] I'm going to get to the ramifications in a second. I want you to have the data. You can go to explorer.dagtech.network. That's going to take you to the community's, quote, explorer, but it has a comparison widget where it'll show you transparently. Here's the official, which is BDAG scan. Here's this so-called community side. And the main difference between the two is the difference in blocks. There's a significant amount of transactions that simply do not exist in the community side

[00:17:16] that exist on the BDAG scan side, but the BDAG scan side has less blocks. That's because the BDAG scan side purposely does not have significant traffic or activity happening on it because it's only single node. It doesn't have anywhere near the bandwidth to be able to do more than what it's doing. The community side has, as of last count, 19, 20 peers.

[00:17:40] Each of the peers is a different RPC connected to that ledger, meaning that they all agree this is what it should look like. They refer to this as the so-called canonical. It's not canonical RPC. It's not canonical chain. It's canonical ledger, meaning the list of transactions, all the amounts, all the values, everything they are declaring just in of themselves, that it is the authoritative just because they say so.

[00:18:10] Not because it is, because they say so. Now, why did I word it that way? Because if you put money into the pre-sale at any point and you still had coins locked in that damn site and you never claimed those coins to your wallet prior to when they branched it off, you don't have those on the community side. You're starting from scratch because they did not replicate that whole setup.

[00:18:39] They exist in terms of where the wallet is because it's a mirror. It's a copy. So they know which wallet holds those coins on your behalf. They say themselves, it's nothing more than glorified database. That means they have access to that distribution and they could reallocate those coins to you should they choose to. I don't see that they did. If they did and you got that information, crypto talk.fm hit the contact form or comments below and let us know where it is.

[00:19:09] We looked, I didn't see it myself. I didn't see. I'm talking about the pre-sale stuff. I'm talking about the beat vesting, the zero vesting, all the stuff we're talking. We're not talking the nonsense, fake, you know, the coins, fake stuff. I'm talking the pre-sale talking everything that left this point where remember you got a lock and you got a cliff and it's locked for 12 months that those coins where you might have like a hundred thousand to 600,000 or something.

[00:19:34] Those far as I can tell, you do not have those on the community side. If you've got evidence that you do crypto talk.fm hit the contact form, hit comments below. But from what I could see, I didn't see that those were accounted for. That's where your investment, the initial investment went to. So on the community side, they would have to account for those. Otherwise it's essentially a rug pull. I know some don't like that. Listen to what I'm telling you.

[00:20:01] If they know those coins are allocated to specific wallets, they have to make them available to you on this so-called community side somehow, even if it means you meant them for people to make them whole. If your goal is to make them whole, then that's what you would have to do. If you don't do that, it's essentially a rug pull. That's coming from the community side though, because those numbers still exist on the BDAC scan side.

[00:20:29] That's why I say the lie is coming from an unexpected place because the BDAG Scan side, that dashboard still has every single number that they've ever reported to you so far. You don't have them in the wallet, so you don't really have them, but they're accounted for. The transactions accounted for the different buyback liquidity wallets, whether they're legit or not. I'm only talking about the transactions. I'm talking about the integrity of transactions. I'm talking about the clarity and completion of the ledger.

[00:20:56] That's all I'm talking about from a completion of ledger perspective. Only BDAC scan right now is the authoritative source because it, this community branched too early, was not in concert and was not on level with the BDAC scan side as agreed. So it's essentially a hostile type deal. That's going off doing its own thing. That means if you, because you're hearing the sales pitch or you're listening to the mark

[00:21:25] or you're listening to the remnants of the consensus telling you it's the right answer, I want you to understand and listen to me carefully here. If they don't account for your coins that you paid for in the pre-sale somehow, I'm saying if they don't, it's a rug pull and you're starting over from scratch. If you adopt that, you are starting over from scratch. If you're cool with that, great. Just be clear.

[00:21:50] If you're so angry at what happened with the block tag, that is the original one. If you're so pissed about it, you can't stand visuals. You can't stand the history. You can't stand what got us to this to the point. You're willing to just start over and lose your money. If it's that bad, then yes, the community stuff's out there. You can connect to those RPCs and within that garden, which is that ledger, you can connect,

[00:22:16] you can stake, you can send, you can do the whole nine with any of those RPCs. And what that gets you, it gets you a feel good moment of quote decentralization because that's all you would have if your stuff was staked. So let's say you staked X number of coins that you claimed prior to when they branched it off. And it was in the staking.bdackscan, those got copied over to staking.blockdack.engineering and they're still staked there. The rewards are still accruing there.

[00:22:43] So if you stake them and didn't touch them, you're good. If you bought from an exchange, which is what you should have done because Leicester told you to do that repeatedly. If you bought from exchanges, when the exchanges gave you the opportunity to buy, if you bought from WeBot, when WeBot allowed you to withdraw or when the other ones allowed you to withdraw, if you bought from exchanges, withdrew them from the exchanges before the withdrawals got locked up. Far as I can tell, those coins are fine on both sides.

[00:23:13] Those coins were accounted for, but it had to have been done prior to the branch off. The way you know this, you go to staking.bdackscan.com, connect your wallet, click on your address on the upper right. It's going to show you the balance in your wallet. Stop. Note that down. Make sure it matches what you see. Go to the staking.bdack.engineering, connect your wallet, click on your address in the upper right.

[00:23:39] If you don't see your balance, it means they've left those behind. They're not accounting for them. They would essentially be lost if you adopt that ledger. They're not there. That's the problem. The problem is the way they forked it, the timing of the forking, the lack of communication, the fact it's not in concert. There's a chance you might lose coins if you adopt that one because so far you've only transacted this one here. And when they did the forking happened to correlate to the chaos with the exchanges.

[00:24:09] So the smart ones who went to the exchange, like I adamantly told people day after day after day when I told people we bought legit, go to we bought, buy an exchange, stop buying on the site. Those who listen to me, those who listen to me, you're going to see you've got a bag you can use on two sides if you choose to period. Just verify it. Don't listen. Don't trust me. Verify it. Staking.bdackscan.com. Click your address.

[00:24:39] Check the balance. It says staking.bdack.engineering. Click the address. Check the balance. It shows check your staking balance on both sides. Understand what's going on. It's because they are tracking two different ledgers. As long as the balance matches, when you click your address on the upper right, you're good on either. And you can then choose. You can make an informed decision. However you want to do. It doesn't matter. You can do both. If you frankly want, just understand you might get blacklisted by one of them.

[00:25:08] But the point is that you could, if you see that the balance is the same on both, that means you're good. It's like pulse chain. When pulse chain did their sacrifice and they essentially copied Ethereum. Over. You got those same coins on the new pulse chain that you would have had on the Ethereum network when it copied over. That's the same thing that would happen here. But in this case, that only is true if you bought from exchanges or you had them staked

[00:25:35] or you had them sitting in the wallet, weren't doing transactions that got left behind between say mid January. And now some people are going to do what I asked, go check the two staking and they're going to see a discrepancy. That's your choice. You now are at a choice point. Okay. If you go with the one just because you're so pissed and you think Jeremy's that got your best interest at heart, despite him and Nick being pathological liars, that's fine.

[00:26:04] Just know you're starting over and come to grips with it. Even if you have shit staked in there, if it doesn't account for any BDAG in your wallet, you're not going to be able to claim those because you have to have BDAG to be able to claim it. And you don't have any to begin with and you can't transfer from anywhere because that wouldn't exist on the ledger because they left it behind because they don't have the claim ones that were part of the rolling release off the cliff. Do you understand? You are accepting. I might have to leave shit behind.

[00:26:30] Two, the community one is significantly more expensive than the BDAG scan one with respect to fees, gas fees. I tested myself. It took one BDAG, which isn't a lot, but it's way more than the BDAG scan side is. The BDAG scan side is a fraction, which I think is bad, but it's worse on the community side if your coins were left behind because you won't have enough gas in the wallet to do that kind of transaction.

[00:26:56] You might have a dust amount left in there that would have been fine on the BDAG scan side. On the community side, you might not have enough to even unstake or get your rewards out the very first time. Now the community side could easily solve that by simply doing a simple airdrop 10 BDAG to every single one that they see on that side. It's their ledger. They can do that. They can airdrop 10 just to get you get, that's what Pulse Chain did. They airdropped a thousand PLS.

[00:27:26] I think it's PLS to every single wallet that was on there because people need gas to do this new one. So they airdropped it. So I'm, I'm calling them out. I'm putting the gauntlet down to the dumb and dumber on the community side. You seem to not understand that you still fucking have to have gas to do the shit. If people had stuff locked in there, or you need to account for every single one of those coins. People have locked in the claim portal because you left those behind from what I can tell.

[00:27:53] If you didn't leave them behind, put it up there and make it clear and not in telescam. I'm talking on your site that you have put it on the site. Here's where you go get those claim coins so you can get those out. So you have gas. So if your state you're made whole, that's fine. Or airdrop a thousand BDAG to everybody. So they have gas in the wallet. You need to do something because if they've got shit locked in there, as many do, you got to make them whole is my call out to you. That rhymes.

[00:28:18] Now for the BDAG scan side, he's a brilliant mind because what he did when he did this announcement about the blackout and the quote newbie DAG, he actually took what happened. This is probably correlating to when Nick got fired. Now I'm putting it together. He probably took what happened and said, shit, this is an opportunity. Here's your other history lesson. As I wrap up, Ethereum.

[00:28:48] Ethereum had it hacked. 2016. Go do a search called the DAO. D-A-O. Do a search. The DAO preceded what we now know of as Ethereum. It had its own token and it was an oversight over the Ethereum chain that was. It'll make sense in a second. It was oversight over it. It was the DAO and it was autonomous. It was truly autonomous. The code itself was executing commands as voted by the community who held the DAO tokens.

[00:29:17] The DAO token was shared on exchanges and whole nine. There were warnings leading up to it. It gets breached. After it gets breached, Ethereum gets drained. After Ethereum gets drained, it gets forked off. What we knew of back then as Ethereum became Ethereum Classic. The current Ethereum that we have was a fork off. It was complete fork off. Hard fork. The Ethereum that we have now, obviously you saw it. It ran up damn near to $6,000. Crap back down.

[00:29:46] But it's still up there. And most of its drop is attributed to the moving away from proof of work and proof of stake. I argued killed it because you were making a lot of money on proof of work. Regardless, Ethereum Classic is still out there. Ethereum Classic was pennies at the time. It climbed up to like $100, $200 or whatever. It was a significant amount of money. This situation is very similar to what happened there except that the chain didn't actually fork off.

[00:30:16] Simply the ledgers. The agreement of ledgers between two. Now, there's two things to be mindful of with what I just said. The team on one of the AMAs said that EJLS would have to rename its token something else to keep it independent. He doesn't have to do shit. It's a blockchain that is anybody can create a ledger and create their own consensus within the ledger. Unless you fork it off, he doesn't have to do shit. Because he's the original.

[00:30:45] Because he's the one that ultimately set the shit up. He actually is the authoritative. So, if anything, you would have to change yours, folks. And not call it BDAG. Call it any of the fuck thing else you want to. Which I think would have been a smarter avenue to go with because you could have had a marketing opportunity here. Instead of doing what you did, dumb and dumber. Why didn't you just create another fucking shit off the side like you just did? But call it something else. Call it anything else. Because you did not give them the claim tokens as far as coins as far as I can tell.

[00:31:15] So, what the fuck does it matter? You might as well spin up a brand new one and do that off on your own. Totally independent of the said. They keep saying that they don't have a lot of money. They can't keep RPC.Blockdag.engineering running. Allegedly, according to somebody in the community, it's because of money. Why is it that they're struggling to pay for this situation after multiple months where they were paid under the Blockdag company? We know they were not working for free. So, how is it then? Think of this.

[00:31:44] How is it that Jeremy allegedly, Nick allegedly, Liza allegedly, Marius Bach, how is it that they could have been working for a year and a half and now they're broke on the tail end side? There's no way they were working for free for that long. I don't buy it. They were paid. Marius Bach said they were paid. Liza said they were paid up to a point. Are we suggesting that the pay was so damn low but they still kept going?

[00:32:09] Or are we suggesting that none of them are any good with their fucking money to where they're now broke after the fact? How is that possible? We saw Turner go into fancy fucking restaurants and shit. We know South Africa is not crazy high in the cost of living. How is it that these people are all broke after they leave this Blockdag situation? Are they suggesting they were paid pennies? If they were paid pennies, why did they stay so long? This is why I said I wasn't going to focus too much on the money side because none of it makes any sense.

[00:32:38] Because now we're talking this whole new setup, this whole new ledger, whole rogue infrastructure that they set up outside that they're trying to sell the community is the authoritative when it's not. They're trying to make it the authoritative. If you want to adopt as authoritative, that's fine. Just as long as you accept what that means. That means you are giving up the money you put in the pre-sale. That's literally what it means. They're essentially asking you to start over from scratch because you care more about decentralization

[00:33:07] than to hope you get your money back because they're saying you won't get your money back because he's already taken it and run. He's not running. He's still there. I don't know what the hell happened with the funds other than the fact that the $400 million was just a marketing bullshit that wasn't real. I do know that Nick is on record with lodging $600 million. So he lied. So he's a pathological liar. Jeremy's already a proven liar. So why are we believing these liars versus that liar? You're surrounded by liars. This is why it's easy.

[00:33:37] That's why it's easy because you're surrounded by liars. You've got a choice that you should make. The first thing you should do to make that choice and facilitate it is to do what I ask. Go to staking.bdackscan.com. Connect your wallet. Click on your address in the upper right. What is the balance that's there? I'm talking the balance on that upper right, not the balance state. I'm talking the balance on that when you click on your wallet should be what is in your wallet right now. In terms of BDAG. That number should match.

[00:34:07] If they match, you're good as far as that ledger. Go to staking.bdack.engineering. Connect your wallet. Do the same step. Click your address. Does that number match? If it does, you're good. In terms of what's staked on both of them. Do they match? They should match. It should be the same number. If they don't match, whatever has the greater number, you need to decide. Do I want the greater number because that's what should be? Or do I want the lesser number because of whoever's selling whatever? Snake oil.

[00:34:37] I can't make the decision for you. I'm simply highlighting for you what it means to make the decision. If you're one of these that's listened to Leicester at Crypto Talk FM and you made out and you said, you know, I went to WeBot. I bought a bag and I sat on the shit and didn't do anything else. Or maybe you played with staking a little bit, but you were, you spun up a separate wallet to do it because you didn't trust that liar over there. Right? But you're still sitting on a major bag. You're just kind of waiting shit out like me. You go look at the numbers.

[00:35:06] You're going to see the numbers match on both staking apps. If the number matches on both staking apps, you know what that means? That means you got a bag on two chains, just like pulse chain. That means no matter what happens, let's say one of them runs and one of them fails. You still got the bag over there. Let's say both of them managed to do something. You got two bags. This is called opportunity.

[00:35:29] This is why the exchanges always have been, always will be the key to success of any of these type blockchain projects. You've got to have the free market. You've got to have freedom of exchange. I know there were situations where they locked it down. I'm not saying that wasn't true. I'm saying there was a time with each and every one of these that you could have bought on the exchange for dirt fucking cheap, sat on the fucking bag, then wait on it to withdraw.

[00:35:55] Once you can withdraw, send it to your wallet and just sit on it and just wait and see what's going to happen. Those that simply follow the formal marketing and they went to be tax or block that network and they bought these nonsense sales of 100 coins crap. And then the compression and they kept doing it. And people that YOLO'd more than they can afford to lose.

[00:36:17] I can't help you other than to educate you as to how simple this is, because I figured one thing has to happen. One thing has to happen, which is I just got to get the coins in the wallet and I want to get the largest bag I can. And I said months ago, your coins that are locked into dupe dupe never mattered. They never mattered. They were there to get them on exchanges. That's it.

[00:36:46] They were there to show something. That's it. They didn't matter. I have more to say, but I think I've said enough. I think I've level set what's going on. You have a choice to make. First, again, check staking.bdackscan.com. Check your balance that matches your wallet. Go to staking.blockdack.engineering. Check your balance that matches your wallet. If you see a discrepancy, make a choice. Understand those are gone because they did not do those transactions.

[00:37:15] If they match, continue to sit because one of these might be something. And if it is, you've got coins on that one and you can kind of run with it. Or both of them have their own successes and now you've got a double bag. Either way, just make a choice and understand very crystal clearly. That which is referred to as, quote, community are still vigilantes that went off on their own out of frustration,

[00:37:42] born from the consensus and everything from the liar. But that same community side is led by people who are also pathological liars. You are choosing from different liars. You simply need to choose which set of lies you believe less versus more. You are choosing from different liars.